![]() Plagiarism is thought to be common but to have little impact on truth although it ranked high on aggregate level impact on trust. The “deadly sins” of fabrication and falsification ranked highest on the impact on truth but low to moderate on aggregate level impact on truth, due to their low estimated frequency. The rankings suggest that selective reporting, selective citing, and flaws in quality assurance and mentoring are viewed as the major problems of modern research. Response was 17% of those who were sent the invitational email and 33% of those who opened it. Additionally, relevant demographic and professional background information was collected from participants. We ranked misbehaviors based on mean scores. We expressed the aggregate level impact as the product of frequency scores and truth, trust and preventability scores, respectively. ![]() They were asked to score 60 research misbehaviors according to their views on and perceptions of the frequency of occurrence, preventability, impact on truth (validity), and impact on trust between scientists on 5-point scales. MethodsĪ survey was conducted among 1353 attendees of international research integrity conferences. Little is known about what the most frequent research misbehaviors are and what their impact is if they occur. ![]() However, at the aggregate level, lesser forms of research misbehavior may be more important due to their much higher prevalence. ![]() Codes of conduct mainly focus on research misconduct that takes the form of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |